The study showed older people with diabetes on Avandia compared to patients taking Actos, showed 27% higher risk of stroke
- 25% higher risk of heart failure
- 14% higher risk of death
For every 60 plus patients who take Avandia instead of Actos for one year, there would be one extra heart attack, heart failure, stroke, or death. Is this risk big enough? Dr Graham also categorically said that even if a person was on Avandia currently and nothing untoward has happened till date it was advisable if they shift to Actos and reduce further risk. Why prescribe 'Avandia' when a safer alternative was there? Why prescribe a drug that would either land you in a hospital or the cemetery?
The second study, co-written by Dr. Nissen, after updating his 2007 also conclusively brought home the fact that Avandia increased the risks of heart attack by 39 percent and the risks of heart-related death by 46 percent.
However the pharma in question viz GlaxoSmithKline contradicted the claim and said after 6 much better studies, Avandia neither increased the over all risk of heart attack nor lead to stroke or death.
The question on everybody's lips are -why is AVANDIA still prescribed especially with Actos giving similar benefits with fewer repercussions?
Compiled by
Vijayalakshmi Iyengar
Sr. Dietitian: NutritionVista.com
Sources:
© 2007 - 2024 NutritionVista.com. All rights reserved. A single copy of these materials may be reprinted for noncommercial personal use only. All articles and content written by the Nutritionvista.com team for NutritionVista.com are the sole property of J.L.S Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. Content may not be copied without express permission to do so. If you want to link back to an article, please ensure a working link to the article title is used and is functioning at all times.